SpaceNLI: Evaluating the Consistency of Predicting Inferences in Space
원문 초록
While many natural language inference (NLI) datasets target certain semantic phenomena, e.g., negation, tense & aspect, monotonicity, and presupposition, to the best of our knowledge, there is no NLI dataset that involves diverse types of spatial expressions and reasoning. We fill this gap by semi-automatically creating an NLI dataset for spatial reasoning, called SpaceNLI. The data samples are automatically generated from a curated set of reasoning patterns, where the patterns are annotated with inference labels by experts. We test several SOTA NLI systems on SpaceNLI to gauge the complexity of the dataset and the system's capacity for spatial reasoning. Moreover, we introduce a Pattern Accuracy and argue that it is a more reliable and stricter measure than the accuracy for evaluating a system's performance on pattern-based generated data samples. Based on the evaluation results we find that the systems obtain moderate results on the spatial NLI problems but lack consistency per inference pattern. The results also reveal that non-projective spatial inferences (especially due to the "between" preposition) are the most challenging ones.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Thunder-NUBench: A Benchmark for LLMs' Sentence-Level Negation Understanding
Negation: A Pink Elephant in the Large Language Models' Room?
Exploring Spatial Language Grounding Through Referring Expressions
Multi-head attention debiasing and contrastive learning for mitigating Dataset Artifacts in Natural Language Inference
Warehouse Spatial Question Answering with LLM Agent
Scaling RL to Long Videos
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.