Is ChatGPT a Biomedical Expert? -- Exploring the Zero-Shot Performance of Current GPT Models in Biomedical Tasks
원문 초록
We assessed the performance of commercial Large Language Models (LLMs) GPT-3.5-Turbo and GPT-4 on tasks from the 2023 BioASQ challenge. In Task 11b Phase B, which is focused on answer generation, both models demonstrated competitive abilities with leading systems. Remarkably, they achieved this with simple zero-shot learning, grounded with relevant snippets. Even without relevant snippets, their performance was decent, though not on par with the best systems. Interestingly, the older and cheaper GPT-3.5-Turbo system was able to compete with GPT-4 in the grounded Q&A setting on factoid and list answers. In Task 11b Phase A, focusing on retrieval, query expansion through zero-shot learning improved performance, but the models fell short compared to other systems. The code needed to rerun these experiments is available through GitHub.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
RMIT-ADM+S at the SIGIR 2025 LiveRAG Challenge
TableRAG: A Retrieval Augmented Generation Framework for Heterogeneous Document Reasoning
Efficient Medical Vision-Language Alignment Through Adapting Masked Vision Models
CC-RAG: Structured Multi-Hop Reasoning via Theme-Based Causal Graphs
Zero-Shot Learning Based Approach For Medieval Word Recognition Using Deep-Learned Features
From Roots to Rewards: Dynamic Tree Reasoning with RL
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.