arXiv:2306.15369
공식 코드 · Papers with Code
A Meta-analytical Comparison of Naive Bayes and Random Forest for Software Defect Prediction
원문 초록
Is there a statistical difference between Naive Bayes and Random Forest in terms of recall, f-measure, and precision for predicting software defects? By utilizing systematic literature review and meta-analysis, we are answering this question. We conducted a systematic literature review by establishing criteria to search and choose papers, resulting in five studies. After that, using the meta-data and forest-plots of five chosen papers, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the two models. The results have shown that there is no significant statistical evidence that Naive Bayes perform differently from Random Forest in terms of recall, f-measure, and precision.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Generative AI and Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis
Explicit and Implicit Representations in AI-based 3D Reconstruction for Radiology: A Systematic Review
AI-driven Personalized Privacy Assistants: a Systematic Literature Review
Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature Review
Online Continual Learning: A Systematic Literature Review of Approaches, Challenges, and Benchmarks
Large Language Models in Computer Science Education: A Systematic Literature Review
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.