Dialectical Reconciliation via Structured Argumentative Dialogues
원문 초록
We present a novel framework designed to extend model reconciliation approaches, commonly used in human-aware planning, for enhanced human-AI interaction. By adopting a structured argumentation-based dialogue paradigm, our framework enables dialectical reconciliation to address knowledge discrepancies between an explainer (AI agent) and an explainee (human user), where the goal is for the explainee to understand the explainer's decision. We formally describe the operational semantics of our proposed framework, providing theoretical guarantees. We then evaluate the framework's efficacy ``in the wild'' via computational and human-subject experiments. Our findings suggest that our framework offers a promising direction for fostering effective human-AI interactions in domains where explainability is important.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
$τ^2$-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment
Comparative Analysis of AI Agent Architectures for Entity Relationship Classification
ThinkTank: A Framework for Generalizing Domain-Specific AI Agent Systems into Universal Collaborative Intelligence Platforms
AgentCPM-GUI: Building Mobile-Use Agents with Reinforcement Fine-Tuning
Will Agents Replace Us? Perceptions of Autonomous Multi-Agent AI
From Knowledge to Noise: CTIM-Rover and the Pitfalls of Episodic Memory in Software Engineering Agents
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.