Is the Volume of a Credal Set a Good Measure for Epistemic Uncertainty?
원문 초록
Adequate uncertainty representation and quantification have become imperative in various scientific disciplines, especially in machine learning and artificial intelligence. As an alternative to representing uncertainty via one single probability measure, we consider credal sets (convex sets of probability measures). The geometric representation of credal sets as $d$-dimensional polytopes implies a geometric intuition about (epistemic) uncertainty. In this paper, we show that the volume of the geometric representation of a credal set is a meaningful measure of epistemic uncertainty in the case of binary classification, but less so for multi-class classification. Our theoretical findings highlight the crucial role of specifying and employing uncertainty measures in machine learning in an appropriate way, and for being aware of possible pitfalls.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
VenusX: Unlocking Fine-Grained Functional Understanding of Proteins
SKDU at De-Factify 4.0: Natural Language Features for AI-Generated Text-Detection
Detecting immune cells with label-free two-photon autofluorescence and deep learning
Leveraging Cascaded Binary Classification and Multimodal Fusion for Dementia Detection through Spontaneous Speech
Self-Classification Enhancement and Correction for Weakly Supervised Object Detection
In-Context Learning for Label-Efficient Cancer Image Classification in Oncology
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.