Is AI the better programming partner? Human-Human Pair Programming vs. Human-AI pAIr Programming
원문 초록
The emergence of large-language models (LLMs) that excel at code generation and commercial products such as GitHub's Copilot has sparked interest in human-AI pair programming (referred to as "pAIr programming") where an AI system collaborates with a human programmer. While traditional pair programming between humans has been extensively studied, it remains uncertain whether its findings can be applied to human-AI pair programming. We compare human-human and human-AI pair programming, exploring their similarities and differences in interaction, measures, benefits, and challenges. We find that the effectiveness of both approaches is mixed in the literature (though the measures used for pAIr programming are not as comprehensive). We summarize moderating factors on the success of human-human pair programming, which provides opportunities for pAIr programming research. For example, mismatched expertise makes pair programming less productive, therefore well-designed AI programming assistants may adapt to differences in expertise levels.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
The Devil behind the mask: An emergent safety vulnerability of Diffusion LLMs
Kodezi Chronos: A Debugging-First Language Model for Repository-Scale, Memory-Driven Code Understanding
Rethinking Verification for LLM Code Generation: From Generation to Testing
EvoAgentX: An Automated Framework for Evolving Agentic Workflows
CoreCodeBench: A Configurable Multi-Scenario Repository-Level Benchmark
Estimating Correctness Without Oracles in LLM-Based Code Generation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.