Cross-Genre Argument Mining: Can Language Models Automatically Fill in Missing Discourse Markers?
원문 초록
Available corpora for Argument Mining differ along several axes, and one of the key differences is the presence (or absence) of discourse markers to signal argumentative content. Exploring effective ways to use discourse markers has received wide attention in various discourse parsing tasks, from which it is well-known that discourse markers are strong indicators of discourse relations. To improve the robustness of Argument Mining systems across different genres, we propose to automatically augment a given text with discourse markers such that all relations are explicitly signaled. Our analysis unveils that popular language models taken out-of-the-box fail on this task; however, when fine-tuned on a new heterogeneous dataset that we construct (including synthetic and real examples), they perform considerably better. We demonstrate the impact of our approach on an Argument Mining downstream task, evaluated on different corpora, showing that language models can be trained to automatically fill in discourse markers across different corpora, improving the performance of a downstream model in some, but not all, cases. Our proposed approach can further be employed as an assistive tool for better discourse understanding.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
ABCD: A Graph Framework to Convert Complex Sentences to a Covering Set of Simple Sentences
Leveraging Context for Multimodal Fallacy Classification in Political Debates
CoMuMDR: Code-mixed Multi-modal Multi-domain corpus for Discourse paRsing in conversations
Enhancing Rhetorical Figure Annotation: An Ontology-Based Web Application with RAG Integration
GDTB: Genre Diverse Data for English Shallow Discourse Parsing across Modalities, Text Types, and Domains
CasiMedicos-Arg: A Medical Question Answering Dataset Annotated with Explanatory Argumentative Structures
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.