When to Read Documents or QA History: On Unified and Selective Open-domain QA
원문 초록
This paper studies the problem of open-domain question answering, with the aim of answering a diverse range of questions leveraging knowledge resources. Two types of sources, QA-pair and document corpora, have been actively leveraged with the following complementary strength. The former is highly precise when the paraphrase of given question $q$ was seen and answered during training, often posed as a retrieval problem, while the latter generalizes better for unseen questions. A natural follow-up is thus leveraging both models, while a naive pipelining or integration approaches have failed to bring additional gains over either model alone. Our distinction is interpreting the problem as calibration, which estimates the confidence of predicted answers as an indicator to decide when to use a document or QA-pair corpus. The effectiveness of our method was validated on widely adopted benchmarks such as Natural Questions and TriviaQA.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
TableRAG: A Retrieval Augmented Generation Framework for Heterogeneous Document Reasoning
Efficient Context Selection for Long-Context QA: No Tuning, No Iteration, Just Adaptive-$k$
Answer Complex Questions: Path Ranker Is All You Need
From Roots to Rewards: Dynamic Tree Reasoning with RL
Response Quality Assessment for Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Conditional Conformal Factuality
SimpleDoc: Multi-Modal Document Understanding with Dual-Cue Page Retrieval and Iterative Refinement
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.