PyTrial: Machine Learning Software and Benchmark for Clinical Trial Applications
원문 초록
Clinical trials are conducted to test the effectiveness and safety of potential drugs in humans for regulatory approval. Machine learning (ML) has recently emerged as a new tool to assist in clinical trials. Despite this progress, there have been few efforts to document and benchmark ML4Trial algorithms available to the ML research community. Additionally, the accessibility to clinical trial-related datasets is limited, and there is a lack of well-defined clinical tasks to facilitate the development of new algorithms. To fill this gap, we have developed PyTrial that provides benchmarks and open-source implementations of a series of ML algorithms for clinical trial design and operations. In this paper, we thoroughly investigate 34 ML algorithms for clinical trials across 6 different tasks, including patient outcome prediction, trial site selection, trial outcome prediction, patient-trial matching, trial similarity search, and synthetic data generation. We have also collected and prepared 23 ML-ready datasets as well as their working examples in Jupyter Notebooks for quick implementation and testing. PyTrial defines each task through a simple four-step process: data loading, model specification, model training, and model evaluation, all achievable with just a few lines of code. Furthermore, our modular API architecture empowers practitioners to expand the framework to incorporate new algorithms and tasks effortlessly. The code is available at https://github.com/RyanWangZf/PyTrial.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
How Good Are Synthetic Requirements ? Evaluating LLM-Generated Datasets for AI4RE
SDialog: A Python Toolkit for Synthetic Dialogue Generation and Analysis
Cosmos-Drive-Dreams: Scalable Synthetic Driving Data Generation with World Foundation Models
Optimization-Free Universal Watermark Forgery with Regenerative Diffusion Models
BEAR: BGP Event Analysis and Reporting
Datasheets Aren't Enough: DataRubrics for Automated Quality Metrics and Accountability
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.