Why We Should Report the Details in Subjective Evaluation of TTS More Rigorously
원문 초록
This paper emphasizes the importance of reporting experiment details in subjective evaluations and demonstrates how such details can significantly impact evaluation results in the field of speech synthesis. Through an analysis of 80 papers presented at INTERSPEECH 2022, we find a lack of thorough reporting on critical details such as evaluator recruitment and filtering, instructions and payments, and the geographic and linguistic backgrounds of evaluators. To illustrate the effect of these details on evaluation outcomes, we conducted mean opinion score (MOS) tests on three well-known TTS systems under different evaluation settings and we obtain at least three distinct rankings of TTS models. We urge the community to report experiment details in subjective evaluations to improve the reliability and interpretability of experimental results.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
DeepGesture: A conversational gesture synthesis system based on emotions and semantics
RapFlow-TTS: Rapid and High-Fidelity Text-to-Speech with Improved Consistency Flow Matching
InstructTTSEval: Benchmarking Complex Natural-Language Instruction Following in Text-to-Speech Systems
Pushing the Performance of Synthetic Speech Detection with Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks and Self-Supervised Learning Models
ZipVoice: Fast and High-Quality Zero-Shot Text-to-Speech with Flow Matching
OmniDRCA: Parallel Speech-Text Foundation Model via Dual-Resolution Speech Representations and Contrastive Alignment
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.