Span Identification of Epistemic Stance-Taking in Academic Written English
원문 초록
Responding to the increasing need for automated writing evaluation (AWE) systems to assess language use beyond lexis and grammar (Burstein et al., 2016), we introduce a new approach to identify rhetorical features of stance in academic English writing. Drawing on the discourse-analytic framework of engagement in the Appraisal analysis (Martin & White, 2005), we manually annotated 4,688 sentences (126,411 tokens) for eight rhetorical stance categories (e.g., PROCLAIM, ATTRIBUTION) and additional discourse elements. We then report an experiment to train machine learning models to identify and categorize the spans of these stance expressions. The best-performing model (RoBERTa + LSTM) achieved macro-averaged F1 of .7208 in the span identification of stance-taking expressions, slightly outperforming the intercoder reliability estimates before adjudication (F1 = .6629).
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
eRevise+RF: A Writing Evaluation System for Assessing Student Essay Revisions and Providing Formative Feedback
DECOR: Improving Coherence in L2 English Writing with a Novel Benchmark for Incoherence Detection, Reasoning, and Rewriting
HaRiM$^+$: Evaluating Summary Quality with Hallucination Risk
Neural Automated Writing Evaluation with Corrective Feedback
Automated Evaluation for Student Argumentative Writing: A Survey
Annotation and Classification of Evidence and Reasoning Revisions in Argumentative Writing
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.