AMR4NLI: Interpretable and robust NLI measures from semantic graphs
원문 초록
The task of natural language inference (NLI) asks whether a given premise (expressed in NL) entails a given NL hypothesis. NLI benchmarks contain human ratings of entailment, but the meaning relationships driving these ratings are not formalized. Can the underlying sentence pair relationships be made more explicit in an interpretable yet robust fashion? We compare semantic structures to represent premise and hypothesis, including sets of contextualized embeddings and semantic graphs (Abstract Meaning Representations), and measure whether the hypothesis is a semantic substructure of the premise, utilizing interpretable metrics. Our evaluation on three English benchmarks finds value in both contextualized embeddings and semantic graphs; moreover, they provide complementary signals, and can be leveraged together in a hybrid model.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
A MISMATCHED Benchmark for Scientific Natural Language Inference
Parameter-Efficient Transformer Embeddings
Thunder-NUBench: A Benchmark for LLMs' Sentence-Level Negation Understanding
SALAD: Improving Robustness and Generalization through Contrastive Learning with Structure-Aware and LLM-Driven Augmented Data
Negation: A Pink Elephant in the Large Language Models' Room?
DIBERT: Dependency Injected Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.