Do We Really Need a Large Number of Visual Prompts?
원문 초록
Due to increasing interest in adapting models on resource-constrained edges, parameter-efficient transfer learning has been widely explored. Among various methods, Visual Prompt Tuning (VPT), prepending learnable prompts to input space, shows competitive fine-tuning performance compared to training of full network parameters. However, VPT increases the number of input tokens, resulting in additional computational overhead. In this paper, we analyze the impact of the number of prompts on fine-tuning performance and self-attention operation in a vision transformer architecture. Through theoretical and empirical analysis we show that adding more prompts does not lead to linear performance improvement. Further, we propose a Prompt Condensation (PC) technique that aims to prevent performance degradation from using a small number of prompts. We validate our methods on FGVC and VTAB-1k tasks and show that our approach reduces the number of prompts by ~70% while maintaining accuracy.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
RaMen: Multi-Strategy Multi-Modal Learning for Bundle Construction
Best Practices for Large-Scale, Pixel-Wise Crop Mapping and Transfer Learning Workflows
Robust-Multi-Task Gradient Boosting
PSAT: Pediatric Segmentation Approaches via Adult Augmentations and Transfer Learning
A Survey on Prompt Tuning
DS@GT at CheckThat! 2025: Detecting Subjectivity via Transfer-Learning and Corrective Data Augmentation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.