Not wacky vs. definitely wacky: A study of scalar adverbs in pretrained language models
원문 초록
Vector space models of word meaning all share the assumption that words occurring in similar contexts have similar meanings. In such models, words that are similar in their topical associations but differ in their logical force tend to emerge as semantically close, creating well-known challenges for NLP applications that involve logical reasoning. Modern pretrained language models, such as BERT, RoBERTa and GPT-3 hold the promise of performing better on logical tasks than classic static word embeddings. However, reports are mixed about their success. In the current paper, we advance this discussion through a systematic study of scalar adverbs, an under-explored class of words with strong logical force. Using three different tasks, involving both naturalistic social media data and constructed examples, we investigate the extent to which BERT, RoBERTa, GPT-2 and GPT-3 exhibit general, human-like, knowledge of these common words. We ask: 1) Do the models distinguish amongst the three semantic categories of MODALITY, FREQUENCY and DEGREE? 2) Do they have implicit representations of full scales from maximally negative to maximally positive? 3) How do word frequency and contextual factors impact model performance? We find that despite capturing some aspects of logical meaning, the models fall far short of human performance.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Characterizing Linguistic Shifts in Croatian News via Diachronic Word Embeddings
SoundMind: RL-Incentivized Logic Reasoning for Audio-Language Models
EviNet: Evidential Reasoning Network for Resilient Graph Learning in the Open and Noisy Environments
Are LLMs Reliable Translators of Logical Reasoning Across Lexically Diversified Contexts?
Dissecting Logical Reasoning in LLMs: A Fine-Grained Evaluation and Supervision Study
Climate Finance Bench
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.