Counterfactual Probing for the Influence of Affect and Specificity on Intergroup Bias
원문 초록
While existing work on studying bias in NLP focues on negative or pejorative language use, Govindarajan et al. (2023) offer a revised framing of bias in terms of intergroup social context, and its effects on language behavior. In this paper, we investigate if two pragmatic features (specificity and affect) systematically vary in different intergroup contexts -- thus connecting this new framing of bias to language output. Preliminary analysis finds modest correlations between specificity and affect of tweets with supervised intergroup relationship (IGR) labels. Counterfactual probing further reveals that while neural models finetuned for predicting IGR labels reliably use affect in classification, the model's usage of specificity is inconclusive. Code and data can be found at: https://github.com/venkatasg/intergroup-probing
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Llama See, Llama Do: A Mechanistic Perspective on Contextual Entrainment and Distraction in LLMs
Generative Learner for Distributional Causal Effects
RadiomicsRetrieval: A Customizable Framework for Medical Image Retrieval Using Radiomics Features
Transformer-Based Spatial-Temporal Counterfactual Outcomes Estimation
Unveiling Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models: Reality or Mirage?
Argumentative Ensembling for Robust Recourse under Model Multiplicity
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.