Rethinking Diversity in Deep Neural Network Testing
원문 초록
Motivated by the success of traditional software testing, numerous diversity measures have been proposed for testing deep neural networks (DNNs). In this study, we propose a shift in perspective, advocating for the consideration of DNN testing as directed testing problems rather than diversity-based testing tasks. We note that the objective of testing DNNs is specific and well-defined: identifying inputs that lead to misclassifications. Consequently, a more precise testing approach is to prioritize inputs with a higher potential to induce misclassifications, as opposed to emphasizing inputs that enhance "diversity." We derive six directed metrics for DNN testing. Furthermore, we conduct a careful analysis of the appropriate scope for each metric, as applying metrics beyond their intended scope could significantly diminish their effectiveness. Our evaluation demonstrates that (1) diversity metrics are particularly weak indicators for identifying buggy inputs resulting from small input perturbations, and (2) our directed metrics consistently outperform diversity metrics in revealing erroneous behaviors of DNNs across all scenarios.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
EvoGPT: Enhancing Test Suite Robustness via LLM-Based Generation and Genetic Optimization
Step-wise Policy for Rare-tool Knowledge (SPaRK): Offline RL that Drives Diverse Tool Use in LLMs
Exploring Design of Multi-Agent LLM Dialogues for Research Ideation
MS-DPPs: Multi-Source Determinantal Point Processes for Contextual Diversity Refinement of Composite Attributes in Text to Image Retrieval
Prompt-Free Conditional Diffusion for Multi-object Image Augmentation
Is Diversity All You Need for Scalable Robotic Manipulation?
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.