ToMChallenges: A Principle-Guided Dataset and Diverse Evaluation Tasks for Exploring Theory of Mind
원문 초록
Theory of Mind (ToM), the capacity to comprehend the mental states of distinct individuals, is essential for numerous practical applications. With the development of large language models (LLMs), there is a heated debate about whether they are able to perform ToM tasks. Previous studies have used different tasks and prompts to test the ToM on LLMs and the results are inconsistent: some studies asserted these models are capable of exhibiting ToM, while others suggest the opposite. In this study, We present ToMChallenges, a dataset for comprehensively evaluating the Theory of Mind based on the Sally-Anne and Smarties tests with a diverse set of tasks. In addition, we also propose an auto-grader to streamline the answer evaluation process. We tested three models: davinci, turbo, and gpt-4. Our evaluation results and error analyses show that LLMs have inconsistent behaviors across prompts and tasks. Performing the ToM tasks robustly remains a challenge for the LLMs. In addition, our paper wants to raise awareness in evaluating the ToM in LLMs and we want to invite more discussion on how to design the prompts and tasks for ToM tasks that can better assess the LLMs' ability.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Training-free LLM Merging for Multi-task Learning
VAU-R1: Advancing Video Anomaly Understanding via Reinforcement Fine-Tuning
How Far Can Off-the-Shelf Multimodal Large Language Models Go in Online Episodic Memory Question Answering?
WikiMixQA: A Multimodal Benchmark for Question Answering over Tables and Charts
Instruction Tuning and CoT Prompting for Contextual Medical QA with LLMs
Different Questions, Different Models: Fine-Grained Evaluation of Uncertainty and Calibration in Clinical QA with LLMs
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.