Asking Clarification Questions to Handle Ambiguity in Open-Domain QA
원문 초록
Ambiguous questions persist in open-domain question answering, because formulating a precise question with a unique answer is often challenging. Previously, Min et al. (2020) have tackled this issue by generating disambiguated questions for all possible interpretations of the ambiguous question. This can be effective, but not ideal for providing an answer to the user. Instead, we propose to ask a clarification question, where the user's response will help identify the interpretation that best aligns with the user's intention. We first present CAMBIGNQ, a dataset consisting of 5,654 ambiguous questions, each with relevant passages, possible answers, and a clarification question. The clarification questions were efficiently created by generating them using InstructGPT and manually revising them as necessary. We then define a pipeline of tasks and design appropriate evaluation metrics. Lastly, we achieve 61.3 F1 on ambiguity detection and 40.5 F1 on clarification-based QA, providing strong baselines for future work.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
TableRAG: A Retrieval Augmented Generation Framework for Heterogeneous Document Reasoning
ECoRAG: Evidentiality-guided Compression for Long Context RAG
GenKI: Enhancing Open-Domain Question Answering with Knowledge Integration and Controllable Generation in Large Language Models
Efficient Context Selection for Long-Context QA: No Tuning, No Iteration, Just Adaptive-$k$
Answer Complex Questions: Path Ranker Is All You Need
From Roots to Rewards: Dynamic Tree Reasoning with RL
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.