How Language Model Hallucinations Can Snowball
원문 초록
A major risk of using language models in practical applications is their tendency to hallucinate incorrect statements. Hallucinations are often attributed to knowledge gaps in LMs, but we hypothesize that in some cases, when justifying previously generated hallucinations, LMs output false claims that they can separately recognize as incorrect. We construct three question-answering datasets where ChatGPT and GPT-4 often state an incorrect answer and offer an explanation with at least one incorrect claim. Crucially, we find that ChatGPT and GPT-4 can identify 67% and 87% of their own mistakes, respectively. We refer to this phenomenon as hallucination snowballing: an LM over-commits to early mistakes, leading to more mistakes that it otherwise would not make.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Making Language Model a Hierarchical Classifier and Generator
Describe Anything Model for Visual Question Answering on Text-rich Images
SeqPE: Transformer with Sequential Position Encoding
Is This Just Fantasy? Language Model Representations Reflect Human Judgments of Event Plausibility
ByDeWay: Boost Your multimodal LLM with DEpth prompting in a Training-Free Way
OpenTable-R1: A Reinforcement Learning Augmented Tool Agent for Open-Domain Table Question Answering
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.