The Inside Story: Towards Better Understanding of Machine Translation Neural Evaluation Metrics
원문 초록
Neural metrics for machine translation evaluation, such as COMET, exhibit significant improvements in their correlation with human judgments, as compared to traditional metrics based on lexical overlap, such as BLEU. Yet, neural metrics are, to a great extent, "black boxes" returning a single sentence-level score without transparency about the decision-making process. In this work, we develop and compare several neural explainability methods and demonstrate their effectiveness for interpreting state-of-the-art fine-tuned neural metrics. Our study reveals that these metrics leverage token-level information that can be directly attributed to translation errors, as assessed through comparison of token-level neural saliency maps with Multidimensional Quality Metrics (MQM) annotations and with synthetically-generated critical translation errors. To ease future research, we release our code at: https://github.com/Unbabel/COMET/tree/explainable-metrics.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Evaluation of Czech Sentence Embeddings: Semantic Relevance Doesn't Help with MT Evaluation
ConECT Dataset: Overcoming Data Scarcity in Context-Aware E-Commerce MT
CycleDistill: Bootstrapping Machine Translation using LLMs with Cyclical Distillation
Gender Bias in English-to-Greek Machine Translation
TACTIC: Translation Agents with Cognitive-Theoretic Interactive Collaboration
Pun Intended: Multi-Agent Translation of Wordplay with Contrastive Learning and Phonetic-Semantic Embeddings
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.