A Perspective on Explainable Artificial Intelligence Methods: SHAP and LIME
원문 초록
eXplainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods have emerged to convert the black box of machine learning (ML) models into a more digestible form. These methods help to communicate how the model works with the aim of making ML models more transparent and increasing the trust of end-users into their output. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model Agnostic Explanation (LIME) are two widely used XAI methods, particularly with tabular data. In this perspective piece, we discuss the way the explainability metrics of these two methods are generated and propose a framework for interpretation of their outputs, highlighting their weaknesses and strengths. Specifically, we discuss their outcomes in terms of model-dependency and in the presence of collinearity among the features, relying on a case study from the biomedical domain (classification of individuals with or without myocardial infarction). The results indicate that SHAP and LIME are highly affected by the adopted ML model and feature collinearity, raising a note of caution on their usage and interpretation.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Communicating Smartly in the Molecular Domain: Neural Networks in the Internet of Bio-Nano Things
midr: Learning from Black-Box Models by Maximum Interpretation Decomposition
Do Protein Transformers Have Biological Intelligence?
TIMING: Temporality-Aware Integrated Gradients for Time Series Explanation
Addressing the Scarcity of Benchmarks for Graph XAI
Heart2Mind: Human-Centered Contestable Psychiatric Disorder Diagnosis System using Wearable ECG Monitors
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.