Are Explainability Tools Gender Biased? A Case Study on Face Presentation Attack Detection
원문 초록
Face recognition (FR) systems continue to spread in our daily lives with an increasing demand for higher explainability and interpretability of FR systems that are mainly based on deep learning. While bias across demographic groups in FR systems has already been studied, the bias of explainability tools has not yet been investigated. As such tools aim at steering further development and enabling a better understanding of computer vision problems, the possible existence of bias in their outcome can lead to a chain of biased decisions. In this paper, we explore the existence of bias in the outcome of explainability tools by investigating the use case of face presentation attack detection. By utilizing two different explainability tools on models with different levels of bias, we investigate the bias in the outcome of such tools. Our study shows that these tools show clear signs of gender bias in the quality of their explanations.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
FoundPAD: Foundation Models Reloaded for Face Presentation Attack Detection
VoxAtnNet: A 3D Point Clouds Convolutional Neural Network for Generalizable Face Presentation Attack Detection
Attributes Shape the Embedding Space of Face Recognition Models
Inverting Black-Box Face Recognition Systems via Zero-Order Optimization in Eigenface Space
DiffProb: Data Pruning for Face Recognition
StoryReasoning Dataset: Using Chain-of-Thought for Scene Understanding and Grounded Story Generation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.