Revisiting Automated Prompting: Are We Actually Doing Better?
원문 초록
Current literature demonstrates that Large Language Models (LLMs) are great few-shot learners, and prompting significantly increases their performance on a range of downstream tasks in a few-shot learning setting. An attempt to automate human-led prompting followed, with some progress achieved. In particular, subsequent work demonstrates automation can outperform fine-tuning in certain K-shot learning scenarios. In this paper, we revisit techniques for automated prompting on six different downstream tasks and a larger range of K-shot learning settings. We find that automated prompting does not consistently outperform simple manual prompts. Our work suggests that, in addition to fine-tuning, manual prompts should be used as a baseline in this line of research.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
SQL-o1: Automatic Text-to-SQL Program Synthesis via Self-Reward Heuristic Search
Few-Shot Learning by Explicit Physics Integration: An Application to Groundwater Heat Transport
Universal Music Representations? Evaluating Foundation Models on World Music Corpora
Chameleon: A MatMul-Free Temporal Convolutional Network Accelerator for End-to-End Few-Shot and Continual Learning from Sequential Data
MOLE: Metadata Extraction and Validation in Scientific Papers Using LLMs
Object-level Cross-view Geo-localization with Location Enhancement and Multi-Head Cross Attention
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.