ECG Feature Importance Rankings: Cardiologists vs. Algorithms
원문 초록
Feature importance methods promise to provide a ranking of features according to importance for a given classification task. A wide range of methods exist but their rankings often disagree and they are inherently difficult to evaluate due to a lack of ground truth beyond synthetic datasets. In this work, we put feature importance methods to the test on real-world data in the domain of cardiology, where we try to distinguish three specific pathologies from healthy subjects based on ECG features comparing to features used in cardiologists' decision rules as ground truth. Some methods generally performed well and others performed poorly, while some methods did well on some but not all of the problems considered.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Enhancing interpretability of rule-based classifiers through feature graphs
Profiling Electric Vehicles via Early Charging Voltage Patterns
The Reader is the Metric: How Textual Features and Reader Profiles Explain Conflicting Evaluations of AI Creative Writing
Multi-criteria Rank-based Aggregation for Explainable AI
EPIC: Explanation of Pretrained Image Classification Networks via Prototype
FairSHAP: Preprocessing for Fairness Through Attribution-Based Data Augmentation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.