Yes but.. Can ChatGPT Identify Entities in Historical Documents?
원문 초록
Large language models (LLMs) have been leveraged for several years now, obtaining state-of-the-art performance in recognizing entities from modern documents. For the last few months, the conversational agent ChatGPT has "prompted" a lot of interest in the scientific community and public due to its capacity of generating plausible-sounding answers. In this paper, we explore this ability by probing it in the named entity recognition and classification (NERC) task in primary sources (e.g., historical newspapers and classical commentaries) in a zero-shot manner and by comparing it with state-of-the-art LM-based systems. Our findings indicate several shortcomings in identifying entities in historical text that range from the consistency of entity annotation guidelines, entity complexity, and code-switching, to the specificity of prompting. Moreover, as expected, the inaccessibility of historical archives to the public (and thus on the Internet) also impacts its performance.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Selecting and Merging: Towards Adaptable and Scalable Named Entity Recognition with Large Language Models
Label-Guided In-Context Learning for Named Entity Recognition
AmpleHate: Amplifying the Attention for Versatile Implicit Hate Detection
Named Entity Recognition in Historical Italian: The Case of Giacomo Leopardi's Zibaldone
A Case Study of Cross-Lingual Zero-Shot Generalization for Classical Languages in LLMs
Towards DS-NER: Unveiling and Addressing Latent Noise in Distant Annotations
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.