Cross-GAN Auditing: Unsupervised Identification of Attribute Level Similarities and Differences between Pretrained Generative Models
원문 초록
Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) are notoriously difficult to train especially for complex distributions and with limited data. This has driven the need for tools to audit trained networks in human intelligible format, for example, to identify biases or ensure fairness. Existing GAN audit tools are restricted to coarse-grained, model-data comparisons based on summary statistics such as FID or recall. In this paper, we propose an alternative approach that compares a newly developed GAN against a prior baseline. To this end, we introduce Cross-GAN Auditing (xGA) that, given an established "reference" GAN and a newly proposed "client" GAN, jointly identifies intelligible attributes that are either common across both GANs, novel to the client GAN, or missing from the client GAN. This provides both users and model developers an intuitive assessment of similarity and differences between GANs. We introduce novel metrics to evaluate attribute-based GAN auditing approaches and use these metrics to demonstrate quantitatively that xGA outperforms baseline approaches. We also include qualitative results that illustrate the common, novel and missing attributes identified by xGA from GANs trained on a variety of image datasets.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Robustly Improving LLM Fairness in Realistic Settings via Interpretability
Improving Fairness of Large Language Models in Multi-document Summarization
IndianBailJudgments-1200: A Multi-Attribute Dataset for Legal NLP on Indian Bail Orders
FeDa4Fair: Client-Level Federated Datasets for Fairness Evaluation
Fair for a few: Improving Fairness in Doubly Imbalanced Datasets
Compositional Attribute Imbalance in Vision Datasets
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.