Naive Bayes Classifiers over Missing Data: Decision and Poisoning
원문 초록
We study the certifiable robustness of ML classifiers on dirty datasets that could contain missing values. A test point is certifiably robust for an ML classifier if the classifier returns the same prediction for that test point, regardless of which cleaned version (among exponentially many) of the dirty dataset the classifier is trained on. In this paper, we show theoretically that for Naive Bayes Classifiers (NBC) over dirty datasets with missing values: (i) there exists an efficient polynomial time algorithm to decide whether multiple input test points are all certifiably robust over a dirty dataset; and (ii) the data poisoning attack, which aims to make all input test points certifiably non-robust by inserting missing cells to the clean dataset, is in polynomial time for single test points but NP-complete for multiple test points. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our algorithms are efficient and outperform existing baselines.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Addressing The Devastating Effects Of Single-Task Data Poisoning In Exemplar-Free Continual Learning
Leveraging Predictive Equivalence in Decision Trees
Cross-Domain Conditional Diffusion Models for Time Series Imputation
RADAR: Benchmarking Language Models on Imperfect Tabular Data
VLMs Can Aggregate Scattered Training Patches
IMTS is Worth Time $\times$ Channel Patches: Visual Masked Autoencoders for Irregular Multivariate Time Series Prediction
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.