Fairness Evaluation in Text Classification: Machine Learning Practitioner Perspectives of Individual and Group Fairness
원문 초록
Mitigating algorithmic bias is a critical task in the development and deployment of machine learning models. While several toolkits exist to aid machine learning practitioners in addressing fairness issues, little is known about the strategies practitioners employ to evaluate model fairness and what factors influence their assessment, particularly in the context of text classification. Two common approaches of evaluating the fairness of a model are group fairness and individual fairness. We run a study with Machine Learning practitioners (n=24) to understand the strategies used to evaluate models. Metrics presented to practitioners (group vs. individual fairness) impact which models they consider fair. Participants focused on risks associated with underpredicting/overpredicting and model sensitivity relative to identity token manipulations. We discover fairness assessment strategies involving personal experiences or how users form groups of identity tokens to test model fairness. We provide recommendations for interactive tools for evaluating fairness in text classification.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Making Language Model a Hierarchical Classifier and Generator
Robustness of Misinformation Classification Systems to Adversarial Examples Through BeamAttack
Prompt Candidates, then Distill: A Teacher-Student Framework for LLM-driven Data Annotation
PRL: Prompts from Reinforcement Learning
Guarded Query Routing for Large Language Models
The Ripple Effect: On Unforeseen Complications of Backdoor Attacks
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.