The Impacts of Unanswerable Questions on the Robustness of Machine Reading Comprehension Models
원문 초록
Pretrained language models have achieved super-human performances on many Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC) benchmarks. Nevertheless, their relative inability to defend against adversarial attacks has spurred skepticism about their natural language understanding. In this paper, we ask whether training with unanswerable questions in SQuAD 2.0 can help improve the robustness of MRC models against adversarial attacks. To explore that question, we fine-tune three state-of-the-art language models on either SQuAD 1.1 or SQuAD 2.0 and then evaluate their robustness under adversarial attacks. Our experiments reveal that current models fine-tuned on SQuAD 2.0 do not initially appear to be any more robust than ones fine-tuned on SQuAD 1.1, yet they reveal a measure of hidden robustness that can be leveraged to realize actual performance gains. Furthermore, we find that the robustness of models fine-tuned on SQuAD 2.0 extends to additional out-of-domain datasets. Finally, we introduce a new adversarial attack to reveal artifacts of SQuAD 2.0 that current MRC models are learning.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
MRCEval: A Comprehensive, Challenging and Accessible Machine Reading Comprehension Benchmark
RoleMRC: A Fine-Grained Composite Benchmark for Role-Playing and Instruction-Following
Interpretable Traces, Unexpected Outcomes: Investigating the Disconnect in Trace-Based Knowledge Distillation
Understanding LLMs' Cross-Lingual Context Retrieval: How Good It Is And Where It Comes From
Investigating Recent Large Language Models for Vietnamese Machine Reading Comprehension
Pay Attention to Real World Perturbations! Natural Robustness Evaluation in Machine Reading Comprehension
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.