Representation biases in sentence transformers
원문 초록
Variants of the BERT architecture specialised for producing full-sentence representations often achieve better performance on downstream tasks than sentence embeddings extracted from vanilla BERT. However, there is still little understanding of what properties of inputs determine the properties of such representations. In this study, we construct several sets of sentences with pre-defined lexical and syntactic structures and show that SOTA sentence transformers have a strong nominal-participant-set bias: cosine similarities between pairs of sentences are more strongly determined by the overlap in the set of their noun participants than by having the same predicates, lengthy nominal modifiers, or adjuncts. At the same time, the precise syntactic-thematic functions of the participants are largely irrelevant.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
LLMs Are Not Scorers: Rethinking MT Evaluation with Generation-Based Methods
Contrastive Prompting Enhances Sentence Embeddings in LLMs through Inference-Time Steering
Sentence Embeddings as an intermediate target in end-to-end summarisation
JTCSE: Joint Tensor-Modulus Constraints and Cross-Attention for Unsupervised Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddings
Information Leakage of Sentence Embeddings via Generative Embedding Inversion Attacks
Domain Adaptation for Japanese Sentence Embeddings with Contrastive Learning based on Synthetic Sentence Generation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.