Even if Explanations: Prior Work, Desiderata & Benchmarks for Semi-Factual XAI
원문 초록
Recently, eXplainable AI (XAI) research has focused on counterfactual explanations as post-hoc justifications for AI-system decisions (e.g. a customer refused a loan might be told: If you asked for a loan with a shorter term, it would have been approved). Counterfactuals explain what changes to the input-features of an AI system change the output-decision. However, there is a sub-type of counterfactual, semi-factuals, that have received less attention in AI (though the Cognitive Sciences have studied them extensively). This paper surveys these literatures to summarise historical and recent breakthroughs in this area. It defines key desiderata for semi-factual XAI and reports benchmark tests of historical algorithms (along with a novel, naieve method) to provide a solid basis for future algorithmic developments.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
DiCoFlex: Model-agnostic diverse counterfactuals with flexible control
From What Ifs to Insights: Counterfactuals in Causal Inference vs. Explainable AI
Explainable Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Software Development Lifecycle: A Phase-specific Survey
DiCE-Extended: A Robust Approach to Counterfactual Explanations in Machine Learning
Exploring Energy Landscapes for Minimal Counterfactual Explanations: Applications in Cybersecurity and Beyond
Llama See, Llama Do: A Mechanistic Perspective on Contextual Entrainment and Distraction in LLMs
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.