Language Embeddings Sometimes Contain Typological Generalizations
원문 초록
To what extent can neural network models learn generalizations about language structure, and how do we find out what they have learned? We explore these questions by training neural models for a range of natural language processing tasks on a massively multilingual dataset of Bible translations in 1295 languages. The learned language representations are then compared to existing typological databases as well as to a novel set of quantitative syntactic and morphological features obtained through annotation projection. We conclude that some generalizations are surprisingly close to traditional features from linguistic typology, but that most of our models, as well as those of previous work, do not appear to have made linguistically meaningful generalizations. Careful attention to details in the evaluation turns out to be essential to avoid false positives. Furthermore, to encourage continued work in this field, we release several resources covering most or all of the languages in our data: (i) multiple sets of language representations, (ii) multilingual word embeddings, (iii) projected and predicted syntactic and morphological features, (iv) software to provide linguistically sound evaluations of language representations.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
OFA: A Framework of Initializing Unseen Subword Embeddings for Efficient Large-scale Multilingual Continued Pretraining
How does a Multilingual LM Handle Multiple Languages?
Multilingual Word Embeddings for Low-Resource Languages using Anchors and a Chain of Related Languages
Characterizing Linguistic Shifts in Croatian News via Diachronic Word Embeddings
A Comparative Analysis of Static Word Embeddings for Hungarian
Geological Inference from Textual Data using Word Embeddings
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.