Quality at the Tail of Machine Learning Inference
원문 초록
Machine learning inference should be subject to stringent inference time constraints while ensuring high inference quality, especially in safety-critical (e.g., autonomous driving) and mission-critical (e.g., emotion recognition) contexts. Neglecting either aspect can lead to severe consequences, such as loss of life and property damage. Many studies lack a comprehensive consideration of these metrics, leading to incomplete or misleading evaluations. The study unveils a counterintuitive revelation: deep learning inference quality exhibits fluctuations due to inference time. To depict this phenomenon, the authors coin a new term, "tail quality," providing a more comprehensive evaluation, and overcoming conventional metric limitations. Moreover, the research proposes an initial evaluation framework to analyze factors affecting quality fluctuations, facilitating the prediction of the potential distribution of inference quality. The effectiveness of the evaluation framework is validated through experiments conducted on deep learning models for three different tasks across four systems.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Point Cloud Compression and Objective Quality Assessment: A Survey
Low-Density 3D Point Cloud Classification
SenseShift6D: Multimodal RGB-D Benchmarking for Robust 6D Pose Estimation across Environment and Sensor Variations
Long-Short Distance Graph Neural Networks and Improved Curriculum Learning for Emotion Recognition in Conversation
DVFL-Net: A Lightweight Distilled Video Focal Modulation Network for Spatio-Temporal Action Recognition
DCR: Quantifying Data Contamination in LLMs Evaluation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.