Model-based control algorithms for the quadruple tank system: An experimental comparison
원문 초록
We compare the performance of proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control, linear model predictive control (LMPC), and nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) for a physical setup of the quadruple tank system (QTS). We estimate the parameters in a continuous-discrete time stochastic nonlinear model for the QTS using a prediction-error-method based on the measured process data and a maximum likelihood (ML) criterion. In the NMPC algorithm, we use this identified continuous-discrete time stochastic nonlinear model. The LMPC algorithm is based on a linearization of this nonlinear model. We tune the PID controller using Skogestad's IMC tuning rules using a transfer function representation of the linearized model. Norms of the observed tracking errors and the rate of change of the manipulated variables are used to compare the performance of the control algorithms. The LMPC and NMPC perform better than the PID controller for a predefined time-varying setpoint trajectory. The LMPC and NMPC algorithms have similar performance.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Differentiable Nonlinear Model Predictive Control
Evaluating the Impact of Model Accuracy for Optimizing Battery Energy Storage Systems
Re4MPC: Reactive Nonlinear MPC for Multi-model Motion Planning via Deep Reinforcement Learning
Deep Operator Neural Network Model Predictive Control
Knot So Simple: A Minimalistic Environment for Spatial Reasoning
Efficient Configuration-Constrained Tube MPC via Variables Restriction and Template Selection
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.