Mind Your Bias: A Critical Review of Bias Detection Methods for Contextual Language Models
원문 초록
The awareness and mitigation of biases are of fundamental importance for the fair and transparent use of contextual language models, yet they crucially depend on the accurate detection of biases as a precursor. Consequently, numerous bias detection methods have been proposed, which vary in their approach, the considered type of bias, and the data used for evaluation. However, while most detection methods are derived from the word embedding association test for static word embeddings, the reported results are heterogeneous, inconsistent, and ultimately inconclusive. To address this issue, we conduct a rigorous analysis and comparison of bias detection methods for contextual language models. Our results show that minor design and implementation decisions (or errors) have a substantial and often significant impact on the derived bias scores. Overall, we find the state of the field to be both worse than previously acknowledged due to systematic and propagated errors in implementations, yet better than anticipated since divergent results in the literature homogenize after accounting for implementation errors. Based on our findings, we conclude with a discussion of paths towards more robust and consistent bias detection methods.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
The BIAS Detection Framework: Bias Detection in Word Embeddings and Language Models for European Languages
Characterizing Linguistic Shifts in Croatian News via Diachronic Word Embeddings
To Bias or Not to Bias: Detecting bias in News with bias-detector
Can Global XAI Methods Reveal Injected Bias in LLMs? SHAP vs Rule Extraction vs RuleSHAP
A Comparative Analysis of Static Word Embeddings for Hungarian
Geological Inference from Textual Data using Word Embeddings
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.