Fairness and bias correction in machine learning for depression prediction: results from four study populations
원문 초록
A significant level of stigma and inequality exists in mental healthcare, especially in under-served populations. Inequalities are reflected in the data collected for scientific purposes. When not properly accounted for, machine learning (ML) models leart from data can reinforce these structural inequalities or biases. Here, we present a systematic study of bias in ML models designed to predict depression in four different case studies covering different countries and populations. We find that standard ML approaches show regularly biased behaviors. We also show that mitigation techniques, both standard and our own post-hoc method, can be effective in reducing the level of unfair bias. No single best ML model for depression prediction provides equality of outcomes. This emphasizes the importance of analyzing fairness during model selection and transparent reporting about the impact of debiasing interventions. Finally, we provide practical recommendations to develop bias-aware ML models for depression risk prediction.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Crowd-SFT: Crowdsourcing for LLM Alignment
Selecting for Less Discriminatory Algorithms: A Relational Search Framework for Navigating Fairness-Accuracy Trade-offs in Practice
A Reproducibility Study of Product-side Fairness in Bundle Recommendation
Fairness-Aware Grouping for Continuous Sensitive Variables: Application for Debiasing Face Analysis with respect to Skin Tone
Guiding LLM Decision-Making with Fairness Reward Models
Fairness Is Not Enough: Auditing Competence and Intersectional Bias in AI-powered Resume Screening
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.