Automatic differentiation is no panacea for phylogenetic gradient computation
원문 초록
Gradients of probabilistic model likelihoods with respect to their parameters are essential for modern computational statistics and machine learning. These calculations are readily available for arbitrary models via automatic differentiation implemented in general-purpose machine-learning libraries such as TensorFlow and PyTorch. Although these libraries are highly optimized, it is not clear if their general-purpose nature will limit their algorithmic complexity or implementation speed for the phylogenetic case compared to phylogenetics-specific code. In this paper, we compare six gradient implementations of the phylogenetic likelihood functions, in isolation and also as part of a variational inference procedure. We find that although automatic differentiation can scale approximately linearly in tree size, it is much slower than the carefully-implemented gradient calculation for tree likelihood and ratio transformation operations. We conclude that a mixed approach combining phylogenetic libraries with machine learning libraries will provide the optimal combination of speed and model flexibility moving forward.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Interpretable Bayesian Tensor Network Kernel Machines with Automatic Rank and Feature Selection
Scalable Bayesian Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models via Stochastic Variational Subspace Inference
Variational Inference with Mixtures of Isotropic Gaussians
Amortized variational transdimensional inference
Synonymous Variational Inference for Perceptual Image Compression
Bayesian Meta-Reinforcement Learning with Laplace Variational Recurrent Networks
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.