How "Multi" is Multi-Document Summarization?
원문 초록
The task of multi-document summarization (MDS) aims at models that, given multiple documents as input, are able to generate a summary that combines disperse information, originally spread across these documents. Accordingly, it is expected that both reference summaries in MDS datasets, as well as system summaries, would indeed be based on such dispersed information. In this paper, we argue for quantifying and assessing this expectation. To that end, we propose an automated measure for evaluating the degree to which a summary is ``disperse'', in the sense of the number of source documents needed to cover its content. We apply our measure to empirically analyze several popular MDS datasets, with respect to their reference summaries, as well as the output of state-of-the-art systems. Our results show that certain MDS datasets barely require combining information from multiple documents, where a single document often covers the full summary content. Overall, we advocate using our metric for assessing and improving the degree to which summarization datasets require combining multi-document information, and similarly how summarization models actually meet this challenge. Our code is available in https://github.com/ariecattan/multi_mds.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
GenerationPrograms: Fine-grained Attribution with Executable Programs
Improving Fairness of Large Language Models in Multi-document Summarization
Ask, Retrieve, Summarize: A Modular Pipeline for Scientific Literature Summarization
Estimating Optimal Context Length for Hybrid Retrieval-augmented Multi-document Summarization
Scaling Multi-Document Event Summarization: Evaluating Compression vs. Full-Text Approaches
Coverage-based Fairness in Multi-document Summarization
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.