A Comprehensive Comparison of Neural Networks as Cognitive Models of Inflection
원문 초록
Neural networks have long been at the center of a debate around the cognitive mechanism by which humans process inflectional morphology. This debate has gravitated into NLP by way of the question: Are neural networks a feasible account for human behavior in morphological inflection? We address that question by measuring the correlation between human judgments and neural network probabilities for unknown word inflections. We test a larger range of architectures than previously studied on two important tasks for the cognitive processing debate: English past tense, and German number inflection. We find evidence that the Transformer may be a better account of human behavior than LSTMs on these datasets, and that LSTM features known to increase inflection accuracy do not always result in more human-like behavior.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Can a Neural Model Guide Fieldwork? A Case Study on Morphological Data Collection
OOVs in the Spotlight: How to Inflect them?
Morphological Inflection with Phonological Features
An Investigation of Noise in Morphological Inflection
Morphological Inflection: A Reality Check
Understanding Compositional Data Augmentation in Typologically Diverse Morphological Inflection
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.