The Tail Wagging the Dog: Dataset Construction Biases of Social Bias Benchmarks
원문 초록
How reliably can we trust the scores obtained from social bias benchmarks as faithful indicators of problematic social biases in a given language model? In this work, we study this question by contrasting social biases with non-social biases stemming from choices made during dataset construction that might not even be discernible to the human eye. To do so, we empirically simulate various alternative constructions for a given benchmark based on innocuous modifications (such as paraphrasing or random-sampling) that maintain the essence of their social bias. On two well-known social bias benchmarks (Winogender and BiasNLI) we observe that these shallow modifications have a surprising effect on the resulting degree of bias across various models. We hope these troubling observations motivate more robust measures of social biases.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Specification-based Security Evaluation of Real-World Agents Tool-Calling under Long-Horizon Context Tasks
Making Language Model a Hierarchical Classifier and Generator
InstructFLIP: Exploring Unified Vision-Language Model for Face Anti-spoofing
Describe Anything Model for Visual Question Answering on Text-rich Images
Assay2Mol: large language model-based drug design using BioAssay context
Kodezi Chronos: A Debugging-First Language Model for Repository-Scale, Memory-Driven Code Understanding
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.