Explanation-by-Example Based on Item Response Theory
원문 초록
Intelligent systems that use Machine Learning classification algorithms are increasingly common in everyday society. However, many systems use black-box models that do not have characteristics that allow for self-explanation of their predictions. This situation leads researchers in the field and society to the following question: How can I trust the prediction of a model I cannot understand? In this sense, XAI emerges as a field of AI that aims to create techniques capable of explaining the decisions of the classifier to the end-user. As a result, several techniques have emerged, such as Explanation-by-Example, which has a few initiatives consolidated by the community currently working with XAI. This research explores the Item Response Theory (IRT) as a tool to explaining the models and measuring the level of reliability of the Explanation-by-Example approach. To this end, four datasets with different levels of complexity were used, and the Random Forest model was used as a hypothesis test. From the test set, 83.8% of the errors are from instances in which the IRT points out the model as unreliable.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Communicating Smartly in the Molecular Domain: Neural Networks in the Internet of Bio-Nano Things
midr: Learning from Black-Box Models by Maximum Interpretation Decomposition
Do Protein Transformers Have Biological Intelligence?
TIMING: Temporality-Aware Integrated Gradients for Time Series Explanation
Time series saliency maps: explaining models across multiple domains
Addressing the Scarcity of Benchmarks for Graph XAI
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.