Causal Intervention-based Prompt Debiasing for Event Argument Extraction
원문 초록
Prompt-based methods have become increasingly popular among information extraction tasks, especially in low-data scenarios. By formatting a finetune task into a pre-training objective, prompt-based methods resolve the data scarce problem effectively. However, seldom do previous research investigate the discrepancy among different prompt formulating strategies. In this work, we compare two kinds of prompts, name-based prompt and ontology-base prompt, and reveal how ontology-base prompt methods exceed its counterpart in zero-shot event argument extraction (EAE) . Furthermore, we analyse the potential risk in ontology-base prompts via a causal view and propose a debias method by causal intervention. Experiments on two benchmarks demonstrate that modified by our debias method, the baseline model becomes both more effective and robust, with significant improvement in the resistance to adversarial attacks.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
One Small and One Large for Document-level Event Argument Extraction
Beyond Single-Event Extraction: Towards Efficient Document-Level Multi-Event Argument Extraction
Small Models Are (Still) Effective Cross-Domain Argument Extractors
Constrained Decoding for Cross-lingual Label Projection
MAVEN-Arg: Completing the Puzzle of All-in-One Event Understanding Dataset with Event Argument Annotation
LLMs Learn Task Heuristics from Demonstrations: A Heuristic-Driven Prompting Strategy for Document-Level Event Argument Extraction
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.