On the Relation between Sensitivity and Accuracy in In-context Learning
원문 초록
In-context learning (ICL) suffers from oversensitivity to the prompt, making it unreliable in real-world scenarios. We study the sensitivity of ICL with respect to multiple perturbation types. First, we find that label bias obscures the true sensitivity, and therefore prior work may have significantly underestimated ICL sensitivity. Second, we observe a strong negative correlation between ICL sensitivity and accuracy: predictions sensitive to perturbations are less likely to be correct. Motivated by these findings, we propose \textsc{SenSel}, a few-shot selective prediction method that abstains from sensitive predictions. Experiments on ten classification datasets show that \textsc{SenSel} consistently outperforms two commonly used confidence-based and entropy-based baselines on abstention decisions.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Bridging Generative and Discriminative Learning: Few-Shot Relation Extraction via Two-Stage Knowledge-Guided Pre-training
Relation Extraction or Pattern Matching? Unravelling the Generalisation Limits of Language Models for Biographical RE
DocIE@XLLM25: In-Context Learning for Information Extraction using Fully Synthetic Demonstrations
Assessing the Limits of In-Context Learning beyond Functions using Partially Ordered Relation
Generating Diverse Training Samples for Relation Extraction with Large Language Models
Assay2Mol: large language model-based drug design using BioAssay context
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.