Of Human Criteria and Automatic Metrics: A Benchmark of the Evaluation of Story Generation
원문 초록
Research on Automatic Story Generation (ASG) relies heavily on human and automatic evaluation. However, there is no consensus on which human evaluation criteria to use, and no analysis of how well automatic criteria correlate with them. In this paper, we propose to re-evaluate ASG evaluation. We introduce a set of 6 orthogonal and comprehensive human criteria, carefully motivated by the social sciences literature. We also present HANNA, an annotated dataset of 1,056 stories produced by 10 different ASG systems. HANNA allows us to quantitatively evaluate the correlations of 72 automatic metrics with human criteria. Our analysis highlights the weaknesses of current metrics for ASG and allows us to formulate practical recommendations for ASG evaluation.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
StoryWriter: A Multi-Agent Framework for Long Story Generation
Consistent Story Generation with Asymmetry Zigzag Sampling
Counterfactual reasoning: an analysis of in-context emergence
StoryReasoning Dataset: Using Chain-of-Thought for Scene Understanding and Grounded Story Generation
Learning to Reason for Long-Form Story Generation
Whose story is it? Personalizing story generation by inferring author styles
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.