Valid Inference After Causal Discovery
원문 초록
Causal discovery and causal effect estimation are two fundamental tasks in causal inference. While many methods have been developed for each task individually, statistical challenges arise when applying these methods jointly: estimating causal effects after running causal discovery algorithms on the same data leads to "double dipping," invalidating the coverage guarantees of classical confidence intervals. To this end, we develop tools for valid post-causal-discovery inference. Across empirical studies, we show that a naive combination of causal discovery and subsequent inference algorithms leads to highly inflated miscoverage rates; on the other hand, applying our method provides reliable coverage while achieving more accurate causal discovery than data splitting.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Paths to Causality: Finding Informative Subgraphs Within Knowledge Graphs for Knowledge-Based Causal Discovery
Hillclimb-Causal Inference: A Data-Driven Approach to Identify Causal Pathways Among Parental Behaviors, Genetic Risk, and Externalizing Behaviors in Children
Causal Discovery in Dynamic Fading Wireless Networks
A Fast Kernel-based Conditional Independence test with Application to Causal Discovery
dcFCI: Robust Causal Discovery Under Latent Confounding, Unfaithfulness, and Mixed Data
Causal-Copilot: An Autonomous Causal Analysis Agent
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.