Evaluation and comparison of eight popular Lidar and Visual SLAM algorithms
원문 초록
In this paper, we evaluate eight popular and open-source 3D Lidar and visual SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping) algorithms, namely LOAM, Lego LOAM, LIO SAM, HDL Graph, ORB SLAM3, Basalt VIO, and SVO2. We have devised experiments both indoor and outdoor to investigate the effect of the following items: i) effect of mounting positions of the sensors, ii) effect of terrain type and vibration, iii) effect of motion (variation in linear and angular speed). We compare their performance in terms of relative and absolute pose error. We also provide comparison on their required computational resources. We thoroughly analyse and discuss the results and identify the best performing system for the environment cases with our multi-camera and multi-Lidar indoor and outdoor datasets. We hope our findings help one to choose a sensor and the corresponding SLAM algorithm combination suiting their needs, based on their target environment.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
SuperPoint-SLAM3: Augmenting ORB-SLAM3 with Deep Features, Adaptive NMS, and Learning-Based Loop Closure
LoopDB: A Loop Closure Dataset for Large Scale Simultaneous Localization and Mapping
SupeRANSAC: One RANSAC to Rule Them All
Place Recognition: A Comprehensive Review, Current Challenges and Future Directions
SLAM&Render: A Benchmark for the Intersection Between Neural Rendering, Gaussian Splatting and SLAM
Embracing Dynamics: Dynamics-aware 4D Gaussian Splatting SLAM
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.