AMLB: an AutoML Benchmark
원문 초록
Comparing different AutoML frameworks is notoriously challenging and often done incorrectly. We introduce an open and extensible benchmark that follows best practices and avoids common mistakes when comparing AutoML frameworks. We conduct a thorough comparison of 9 well-known AutoML frameworks across 71 classification and 33 regression tasks. The differences between the AutoML frameworks are explored with a multi-faceted analysis, evaluating model accuracy, its trade-offs with inference time, and framework failures. We also use Bradley-Terry trees to discover subsets of tasks where the relative AutoML framework rankings differ. The benchmark comes with an open-source tool that integrates with many AutoML frameworks and automates the empirical evaluation process end-to-end: from framework installation and resource allocation to in-depth evaluation. The benchmark uses public data sets, can be easily extended with other AutoML frameworks and tasks, and has a website with up-to-date results.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Overtuning in Hyperparameter Optimization
From Tiny Machine Learning to Tiny Deep Learning: A Survey
VirnyFlow: A Design Space for Responsible Model Development
OptiMindTune: A Multi-Agent Framework for Intelligent Hyperparameter Optimization
MLZero: A Multi-Agent System for End-to-end Machine Learning Automation
When Your Own Output Becomes Your Training Data: Noise-to-Meaning Loops and a Formal RSI Trigger
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.