Automated Kantian Ethics: A Faithful Implementation
원문 초록
As we grant artificial intelligence increasing power and independence in contexts like healthcare, policing, and driving, AI faces moral dilemmas but lacks the tools to solve them. Warnings from regulators, philosophers, and computer scientists about the dangers of unethical artificial intelligence have spurred interest in automated ethics-i.e., the development of machines that can perform ethical reasoning. However, prior work in automated ethics rarely engages with philosophical literature. Philosophers have spent centuries debating moral dilemmas so automated ethics will be most nuanced, consistent, and reliable when it draws on philosophical literature. In this paper, I present an implementation of automated Kantian ethics that is faithful to the Kantian philosophical tradition. I formalize Kant's categorical imperative in Dyadic Deontic Logic, implement this formalization in the Isabelle theorem prover, and develop a testing framework to evaluate how well my implementation coheres with expected properties of Kantian ethic. My system is an early step towards philosophically mature ethical AI agents and it can make nuanced judgements in complex ethical dilemmas because it is grounded in philosophical literature. Because I use an interactive theorem prover, my system's judgements are explainable.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
When Ethics and Payoffs Diverge: LLM Agents in Morally Charged Social Dilemmas
HumaniBench: A Human-Centric Framework for Large Multimodal Models Evaluation
Achieving Distributive Justice in Federated Learning via Uncertainty Quantification
Surveying Professional Writers on AI: Limitations, Expectations, and Fears
Analyzing the Safety of Japanese Large Language Models in Stereotype-Triggering Prompts
Toward Robust Non-Transferable Learning: A Survey and Benchmark
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.