SHAP-XRT: The Shapley Value Meets Conditional Independence Testing
원문 초록
The complex nature of artificial neural networks raises concerns on their reliability, trustworthiness, and fairness in real-world scenarios. The Shapley value -- a solution concept from game theory -- is one of the most popular explanation methods for machine learning models. More traditionally, from a statistical perspective, feature importance is defined in terms of conditional independence. So far, these two approaches to interpretability and feature importance have been considered separate and distinct. In this work, we show that Shapley-based explanation methods and conditional independence testing are closely related. We introduce the SHAPley EXplanation Randomization Test (SHAP-XRT), a testing procedure inspired by the Conditional Randomization Test (CRT) for a specific notion of local (i.e., on a sample) conditional independence. With it, we prove that for binary classification problems, the marginal contributions in the Shapley value provide lower and upper bounds to the expected $p$-values of their respective tests. Furthermore, we show that the Shapley value itself provides an upper bound to the expected $p$-value of a global (i.e., overall) null hypothesis. As a result, we further our understanding of Shapley-based explanation methods from a novel perspective and characterize the conditions under which one can make statistically valid claims about feature importance via the Shapley value.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Guiding LLM Decision-Making with Fairness Reward Models
Artificial Delegates Resolve Fairness Issues in Perpetual Voting with Partial Turnout
The Role of Explanation Styles and Perceived Accuracy on Decision Making in Predictive Process Monitoring
Fair for a few: Improving Fairness in Doubly Imbalanced Datasets
One Size Fits None: Rethinking Fairness in Medical AI
Towards Responsible AI: Advances in Safety, Fairness, and Accountability of Autonomous Systems
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.