BERT Rankers are Brittle: a Study using Adversarial Document Perturbations
원문 초록
Contextual ranking models based on BERT are now well established for a wide range of passage and document ranking tasks. However, the robustness of BERT-based ranking models under adversarial inputs is under-explored. In this paper, we argue that BERT-rankers are not immune to adversarial attacks targeting retrieved documents given a query. Firstly, we propose algorithms for adversarial perturbation of both highly relevant and non-relevant documents using gradient-based optimization methods. The aim of our algorithms is to add/replace a small number of tokens to a highly relevant or non-relevant document to cause a large rank demotion or promotion. Our experiments show that a small number of tokens can already result in a large change in the rank of a document. Moreover, we find that BERT-rankers heavily rely on the document start/head for relevance prediction, making the initial part of the document more susceptible to adversarial attacks. More interestingly, we find a small set of recurring adversarial words that when added to documents result in successful rank demotion/promotion of any relevant/non-relevant document respectively. Finally, our adversarial tokens also show particular topic preferences within and across datasets, exposing potential biases from BERT pre-training or downstream datasets.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Precise Zero-Shot Pointwise Ranking with LLMs through Post-Aggregated Global Context Information
How do Large Language Models Understand Relevance? A Mechanistic Interpretability Perspective
Distillation and Refinement of Reasoning in Small Language Models for Document Re-ranking
Beyond Questions: Leveraging ColBERT for Keyphrase Search
DyVo: Dynamic Vocabularies for Learned Sparse Retrieval with Entities
RE-RAG: Improving Open-Domain QA Performance and Interpretability with Relevance Estimator in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.